January 29, 2008 Florida Primary Republicans/Democrats

Republicans

Winner-take-all primary (Closed)
57 delegates at stake
National party officials have decided to count only half of the delegates from Florida as a penalty for holding its primary earlier than allowed. All of the remaining 57 delegates will be awarded to the candidate with the most votes statewide.

Without the penalty, Florida would allocate 114 delegates to the national convention based on the primary results: 75 of those would be divided among candidates with the most votes in each of the state’s 25 Congressional districts. The district-level delegates would be selected at caucuses held sometime between March and May. The rest of the 39 delegates — 36 at-large delegates and three party officials selected at a party meeting — would be allocated to the candidate with the most votes statewide.

Democrats

Proportional primary (Closed)
0 delegates at stake
National party officials have decided to strip Florida of its delegates as a penalty for holding its primary earlier than allowed.

Without the penalty, the primary on Jan. 29 would be the first step in Florida’s nomination process. The state would have a total of 210 delegates — 185 pledged and 25 unpledged. At Congressional district caucuses held on March 1, 121 pledged delegates would be allocated proportionally based on the primary results in each district. The rest of the pledged delegates would be selected by a party committee and would consist of 24 party leaders and elected officials (selected April 5) and 40 at-large delegates (selected May 17). Florida's members of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic members of the state’s Congressional delegation would make up 22 of the unpledged delegates; the other three would be selected by the party.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What did Trump’s 2nd impeachment accomplish?

  That’s happening Former President Donald Trump was  acquitted  by the Senate on Saturday of the charge that he incited the insurrection on Jan. 6. The impeachment trial ended with 57 senators, including  seven Republicans , finding Trump guilty — well short of the two-thirds majority needed to convict. Over the course of a  week of testimony , House impeachment managers laid out the case that Trump was directly responsible for the deadly assault on the U.S. Capitol carried out by a mob of his supporters. Trump’s attorneys countered by arguing that his baseless claims of election fraud were protected by the First Amendment and that the Senate lacked the constitutional authority to convict a president who was no longer in office. Several GOP senators cited the latter argument in explaining their decision to acquit. Senate Minority Leader  Mitch McConnell  said Trump was “practically and morally responsible” for the violence at the Capitol in a scathing speech following the final vote,
Read more

Mildred Loving, Who Battled Ban on Mixed-Race Marriage, Dies at 68

Mildred Loving, a black woman whose anger over being banished from Virginia for marrying a white man led to a landmark Supreme Court ruling overturning state miscegenation laws, died on May 2 at her home in Central Point, Va. She was 68. Peggy Fortune, her daughter, said the cause was pneumonia. The Supreme Court ruling, in 1967, struck down the last group of segregation laws to remain on the books — those requiring separation of the races in marriage. The ruling was unanimous, its opinion written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, who in 1954 wrote the court’s opinion in Brown v. Board of Education, declaring segregated public schools unconstitutional. In Loving v. Virginia, Warren wrote that miscegenation laws violated the Constitution’s equal protection clause. “We have consistently denied the constitutionality of measures which restrict the rights of citizens on account of race,” he said. By their own widely reported accounts, Mrs. Loving and her husband, Richard, were in bed in their m
Read more

31 states have heightened religious freedom protections

Image
The recent flurry of state bills giving religious exemptions from certain laws -- including the Arizona law that Gov. Jan Brewer (R) just vetoed -- raises a question: How many states already provide heightened protection for the exercise of religion? The answer? Thirty-one, 18 of which passed state laws based on the 1993 federal  Religious Freedom Restoration Act . The protections in an additional 13 states came through court rulings. Here's a map of which states have added protections and which do not: "These state RFRAs were enacted in response to Supreme Court decisions that had nothing to do with gay rights or same-sex marriage," explained University of Virginia law professor Douglas Laycock in an e-mail. "And the state court decisions interpreting their state constitutions arose in all sorts of contexts, mostly far removed from  gay rights or same-sex marriage. There were cases about Amish buggies, hunting moose for native Alaskan funeral rituals, an atte
Read more