Paul Ryan: On losing and moving on

Spinners and Winners
In his first national television interview since the 2012 election, Congressman Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., better known as the vice presidential nominee, says losing came as something of a surprise.
"We thought we had a very good chance of winning. You know, the polling and the data and all the people who are the smart people who watch this stuff -- they had a pretty optimistic view on the night," says Ryan. "So as you can imagine, it was a bit of a shock when we didn't win."

But as soon as the final numbers on Virginia and Ohio began coming in, says Ryan, "we knew."
In an interview earlier this week in Wisconsin, the congressman said one reason Obama won was because his campaign drove up turnout in urban areas.

"I'll let the pundits decide exactly how he won," says Ryan. "The point is, he got more votes than we did. That's how he won."

The voter turnout for Obama went beyond urban areas, the president also won non-urban areas in New Hampshire and Iowa.

"The president deserves kudos for having a fantastic ground game," says Ryan. "And the point I'm simply making is, he won. He won fair and square. He got more votes. And that's-- that's the way our system works. And so he ought to be congratulated for that."

But will the chairman of the House Budget Committee work with the re-elected president? Particularly on the thorny issue of raising taxes for couples that earn more than $250,000 per year? And what does Ryan see as the "upside to losing"? Check out this week's Spinners and Winners to find out.

By Jonathan Karl, Richard Coolidge, Jordyn Phelps & Sherisse Pham

Paul Ryan: On losing and moving on

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What did Trump’s 2nd impeachment accomplish?

  That’s happening Former President Donald Trump was  acquitted  by the Senate on Saturday of the charge that he incited the insurrection on Jan. 6. The impeachment trial ended with 57 senators, including  seven Republicans , finding Trump guilty — well short of the two-thirds majority needed to convict. Over the course of a  week of testimony , House impeachment managers laid out the case that Trump was directly responsible for the deadly assault on the U.S. Capitol carried out by a mob of his supporters. Trump’s attorneys countered by arguing that his baseless claims of election fraud were protected by the First Amendment and that the Senate lacked the constitutional authority to convict a president who was no longer in office. Several GOP senators cited the latter argument in explaining their decision to acquit. Senate Minority Leader  Mitch McConnell  said Trump was “practically and morally responsible” for the violence at the Capitol in a scathing speech following the final vote,
Read more

Special counsel Jack Smith asks the Supreme Court to rule quickly on whether Trump can be prosecuted

Image
  WASHINGTON (AP) —   Special counsel Jack Smith   on Monday asked   the Supreme Court   to take up and rule quickly on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election results. Smith made his request for the court to act with unusual speed to prevent any delays that could push back  the trial  of the 2024 Republican presidential primary front-runner, currently set to begin March 4, until after next year’s presidential election. Later Monday, the justices indicated they would decide quickly whether to hear the case, ordering Trump’s lawyers to respond by Dec. 20. The court’s brief order did not signal what it ultimately would do. A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump said he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington to reverse that outcome. Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court, the usual next step in the process, and have the Supreme Court take up the matter directly. “This case presents
Read more